Beyond Suprematism: Relational and Contextual Geometric Abstraction
This research explores the evolution of geometric abstraction beyond its traditional static forms, drawing from Kazimir Malevich’s Suprematism. By introducing relational dynamics, variability, and contextual adaptability, it redefines abstraction as an interactive and evolving framework. Through theoretical analysis and a multi-layered visual project, the study demonstrates how abstract forms can function as a language of engagement, reflecting contemporary cultural and spatial interactions.
Dynamic Abstraction: Evolving Forms and Relational Space
This thesis reinterprets geometric abstraction by integrating relational dynamics, movement, and contextual adaptability, moving beyond Suprematism’s static compositions. By exploring variability in form and spatial interactions, the research demonstrates how abstraction can function as a living language—one that evolves with its environment and audience. Through theoretical analysis and practical experimentation with interactive installations, the project positions abstraction as a tool for engagement, reflecting contemporary cultural and technological shifts while maintaining its philosophical depth.